Disney’s response to Scarlett Johansson’s “Black Widow” lawsuit is being branded by Time’s Up, Women in Film Los Angeles and ReFrame as a “gendered character attack.”
In a joint assertion launched Friday, the advocacy teams wrote:
“While we take no position on the business issues in the litigation between Scarlett Johansson and The Walt Disney Company, we stand firmly against Disney’s recent statement which attempts to characterize Johansson as insensitive or selfish for defending her contractual business rights. This gendered character attack has no place in a business dispute and contributes to an environment in which women and girls are perceived as less able than men to protect their own interests without facing ad hominem criticism.”
On Thursday, the Marvel star filed a lawsuit towards Disney, alleging a breach of contract when the studio launched “Black Widow” in theaters and on Disney+ for streaming concurrently. Johansson’s lawsuit argues that the studio tried to make use of the film to develop its streaming service subscriptions on the expense of her earnings, which have been anticipated to be “based largely on box office receipts.”
Disney’s assertion said that she had already been paid $20 million for the movie and that the discharge on Disney+ boosted her skill to “earn additional compensation.”
“There is no merit whatsoever to this filing,” a Walt Disney Company spokesperson stated. “The lawsuit is especially sad and distressing in its callous disregard for the horrific and prolonged global effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. Disney has fully complied with Ms. Johansson’s contract and furthermore, the release of ‘Black Widow’ on Disney+ with Premier Access has significantly enhanced her ability to earn additional compensation on top of the $20M she has received to date.”
Earlier this week, Johansson’s lawyer, John Berlinski, referred to as Disney’s determination a approach of “hiding” behind COVID-19.
“It’s no secret that Disney is releasing films like ‘Black Widow’ directly onto Disney+ to increase subscribers and thereby boost the company’s stock price – and that it’s hiding behind COVID-19 as a pretext to do so. But ignoring the contracts of the artists responsible for the success of its films in furtherance of this short-sighted strategy violates their rights and we look forward to proving as much in court,” Berlinski wrote in an announcement. “This will surely not be the last case where Hollywood talent stands up to Disney and makes it clear that, whatever the company may pretend, it has a legal obligation to honor its contracts.”
“Black Widow” has grossed $162 million on the home field workplace and $160 million internationally, with Disney reporting a complete of $60 million globally in paid streaming gross sales on opening weekend.
Provided that she will show damages, one agent informed TheWrap that Disney might need to pay Johansson to make up for what she would have constituted of the movie hitting field workplace targets.
“They’re going to have to cut a check for at least $50 million to ScarJo (and likely more) and also for other similarly situated talent on their films that are doing simultaneous theatrical/streaming releases,” the highest agent informed TheWrap.
Gary Marsh to Exit as Disney Branded Television President,
‘The Many Saints of Newark’ Magical and Burdensome, Reviews
‘Shang-Chi’ Adds $21 Million as Box Office Slows Down
‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye,’ ‘The Card Counter’ Revive Indie
‘Trust Me, You Don’t Want This’
Celebrities6 years ago
TV Query: Can ‘Lucifer’s’ Tom Ellis play the piano in real life?
Movies News6 years ago
Aubrey O'Day Reveals Pauly D Has His Penis Pierced: ''We've Been Having Rea…
Movies News2 years ago
Venom struggle scene footage with out CGI is sure to make you giggle
Celebrities5 years ago
‘Vikings’: Who’s the man with one eye? We know the answer