General
Samsung WB250F Smart Wi-Fi Digital Camera, 14.23 Mega Pixal with 18x Optical ZOOM, 3″ LCD display Wi-Fi (Red)
Compact Digital Camera
- Low Light 14PM BSI CMOS Sensor
- Built-in Wi-Fi for File Sharing
- 18x Optical Zoom
- 3.0-inch TFT LCD Screen
- Full 1080p HD Video
Take crystal-clear photos and stunning video with the WB250F Smart Camera from Samsung. With features such as a 14.2-megapixel backside-illuminated sensor and an 18x zoom lens, the WB250F gives you the creative freedom to take great photos even in low-light situations. And with built-in Wi-Fi, you can easily and quickly share your best shots.
Movies News3 years ago
Gary Marsh to Exit as Disney Branded Television President,
Movies News3 years ago
‘The Many Saints of Newark’ Magical and Burdensome, Reviews
Movies News3 years ago
‘Shang-Chi’ Adds $21 Million as Box Office Slows Down
Movies News3 years ago
‘The Eyes of Tammy Faye,’ ‘The Card Counter’ Revive Indie
Movies News3 years ago
‘Trust Me, You Don’t Want This’
-
Movies News5 years agoVenom struggle scene footage with out CGI is sure to make you giggle
-
Celebrities8 years ago
TV Query: Can ‘Lucifer’s’ Tom Ellis play the piano in real life?
-
Movies News8 years ago
Aubrey O'Day Reveals Pauly D Has His Penis Pierced: ''We've Been Having Rea…
-
Celebrities8 years ago
‘Vikings’: Who’s the man with one eye? We know the answer
M. Sarkar
May 1, 2014 at 11:16 am
I’d rate at 3.5 stars. With some improvements, Samsung could have gotten a 4 or 4.5,
I carry a compact camera in my pocket quite often and generally prefer the older models with CCD sensors over the glitzy newer models with their 1/2.5 inch CMOS sensors. For the past 2-3 years, I’ve looked to upgrade for the wider 24-25 mm lenses and the 12-20x zooms on newer cameras, and had hoped that at least one manufacturer would put in a rotating LCD screen (or even a viewfinder, for those glaring sunny days) in a compact pocketable camera. I am not a pixel-peeper and I try to avoid post-processing on the computer. I do not expect to print any larger than 8×10 inch, so I have reasonable expectations from a compact travel camera. Hopefully, that gives you an idea about my perspective on photography with a point-and-shoot compact.
I’ll touch on some points below, having already posted some thoughts in replies to other reviews here and on the older WB150F model’s pages. Your opinions might obviously vary from mine, but please TEST the camera before you question/comment 🙂
With the WB250F, image quality is quite good. I’ve used the P (program) mode, the Auto and the Scene modes. I’m planning to post pics on Google+ using the hashtag #POAB and maybe even a comparison with the Sony HX10V and my older workhorse compact, the Samsung v70 (1/1.8 inch CCD sensor).
For indoor use, I set ISO to 200. The flash power was adequate and image quality was good, too.
The ability to change settings using the physical buttons, the touchscreen or a combination of both definitely makes this WB250F camera fun to use – and it’s often faster than scrolling though menus.
The placement of the pop-up flash, closer to the middle of the body is much more ergonomic than many other cameras. Unlike the Sony and Canon travel zoom models in/above this price range, you can grip the camera quite nicely with BOTH hands and not have to worry about having a finger over the flash. You have to press a button to pop the flash up. I’m sure users’ feelings are mixed about having to manually pop the flash.
I’ll agree with C. Bruce that the WB250F does pretty well in low light mode: it takes a short burst of pics in low light, then flattens them into a single image with fairly good detail. In my experiments, the ISO climbed to 1280 but the image remained usable. Some cameras like the Sony HX10V might easily climb to ISO 3200 in low light mode, but the pics become noisy.
This WB250F camera has a “Rich Tones” mode that uses HDR. In my tests, mostly on dawn and sunset skies, the HDR result seemed a lot more “real” as compared to the red-shifted “watercolor painting” that I got from a Sony in HDR mode. I like a vivid pic as much as anyone else, but the Sony’s HDR went overboard and seemed too fake to me (I prefer “real” over overprocessed photos designed to elicit “oohs” and “aahs”).
Macros come out fine. Colors are pleasing, and without over-saturation.
You can adjust sharpness and contrast via the menu.
Video quality at 720p, MP4 settings seemed good to my eyes, but I haven’t tested extensively. The dedicated video button is located close to the raised thumbgrip. Zooming during video is possible, but you risk “focus hunting” even if you zoom as slowly as possible.
In playback mode, the touchscreen allows swiping to move back or forth. Not a huge thing, but an obvious touch (pun intended) coming from Samsung’s giant footprint in smartphones. Toggling the “display” button (the top of the four-way controller) quickly shows a histogram and the exposure, etc data. One major frustration in playback mode is that the lower ~1/8th of the screen in playback mode gets partly obscured by a panel containing two “soft” buttons. So, unless you patiently wait a few seconds, you cannot see the entire photo in playback. Utterly irresponsible of the Samsung designers. Rather, incomprehensible, given how many other things have been nicely thought through and implemented in the touchscreen user interface.
The WB250F’s 18x optical zoom is snappy but poorly implemented: it doesn’t zoom in reasonably smooth increments. I wonder if the zoom is too fast by intention, or is the zoom lever too sensitive? The initial optical zoom between 1x – approx 5x is fine. However, after 7.8x, it jumps to about 12x, then about 15x, finally 18x. With the jerky zoom, I find it hard to frame a pic at just the right zoom for the scene. Also, the camera often hunts for focus, even when set to center focus. I’ve played with Program, Manual, Auto and the zoom issue persists. The zoom only gets smoother once in *digital* zoom at 19x and above (but pic quality will suffer if using digital zoom).
Focus hunting is fairly common with this camera. This happens sometimes even with good light when focusing on objects without sharp lines, e.g. clouds. Knowing that multi-point focus is more work for the camera, I keep it set to center-weighted focus. So, I’ll lock…
Read more
Was this review helpful to you?
|C. Bruce
May 1, 2014 at 10:53 am
Makes it worth having a separate device for better quality pics!,
I wondered how point and shoot cameras were going to keep up and this camera is an excellent example. This camera is by far better than any cell phone just with the wide angle and zoom capabilities. With the added sharing, touch screen, and intuitiveness that is integrated it makes it an very neat relatively compact device. It’s not as compact as some but way smaller than the larger zoom cameras and is a great compromise.
I have seen a couple cameras with gps and I know one was powered by android. Nice features but I did not see the benefit of having a lot of those features on my camera when I have them on my phone? Also, the price of that camera was significantly more.
Also something to note. This camera actually has a low light sensor that compensates for the light level versus detecting the light level and adjusting the shutter speed. When your shutter speed is slower to allow more light in this gives you more time to move the camera and means image stabilization has more to process. In other words it doesn’t work very well. The samsung has a quick shutter speed in low light situations and does a nice job of compensating for the light therefore also making your pictures clearer and brighter. This is from my experience and the BB rep gave me a demonstration of it when I had narrowed my choices between a canon elph with wifi and the samsung.
0
Was this review helpful to you?
|